e-ISSN: 1309-1719
ISSN: 1309-1786
Period: 2 Issues Annually
Start: 2010
Publisher: Bursa İlahiyat Vakfı

Discourse Strategies and Narrative Repetition in the Qurʾān: A Special Reference to al-Shuʿarāʾ

Discourse Strategies and Narrative Repetition in the Qurʾān: A Special Reference to al-Shuʿarāʾ

Article Sidebar

How to Cite
Farsi, R. (2021). Discourse Strategies and Narrative Repetition in the Qurʾān: A Special Reference to al-Shuʿarāʾ. Ilahiyat Studies, 12(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.121.218


This paper attempts to explain some discursive strategies in relation to the cyclic structure of narratives in the Qurʾānic context of Sūrat “al-Shuʿarāʾ.„ To that end, the paper works on three essential interrelated aspects of study. First, it detects the cyclic structure that interconnects the seven prophets´ narratives within the Sūrah. Second, it investigates the cross-Sūrah interconnections by examining the (re)occurrence of each prophet´s narrative in the preceding and following sūrahs. Third, it discusses how such coherent interrelationships among the relevant sūrahs can reveal certain discourse strategies such as narrative extension, intention, expansion, juxtaposition, and inversion among these sūrahs. Another, yet interrelated, aspect of the study is to explain the “Us/Them„ distinction counted in the Qurʾānic narratives involved, and to show how such dichotomy is realized through the use of referential and predicational strategies. The study adopts and adapts Reisigl and Wodak´s strategies to address this aspect. Within this analytical approach, the narratives are examined on the basis of two strategies; namely, “despatialization„ (actionyms, perceptionyms, anthroponyms, and metaphors of spatiality) and “collectivization„ (pronouns and possessive determiners). The analysis of data reveals some striking findings that can be summarized in two major points: first, each of the narrative´s topoi in the social actors representation evinces the dominance of predicational strategies; second, the Qurʾānic discourse is bias-free and is, thereby, drastically distinguished from other types of discourse such as political discourse


al-Bayyūmī, Muḥammad Rajab. 2000. al-Bayān al-Qurʾānī. Cairo: Al-Dār al-Miṣriyyah al-Lubnāniyyah.

Bin Talal, Ghazi bin Muhammad. 2008. General Editor’s Introduction and Foreword to Jalāl al-Dīn al-Maḥallī and Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī’s. Tafsīr al-Jalālayn. x-xx. Translated by Feras Hamza. Edited and introduced by Ghazi bin Muhammad bin Talal. Louisville: Fons Vitae.

Chilton, Paul Anthony. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Chilton, Paul Anthony, and Christina Schäffner. 1997. “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Theo A. van Dijk, 206-230. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218.

Chittick, William C. 2015. Translator’s Introduction to The unveiling of the mysteries and the provision of the pious: Kashf al-asrār wa-ʿuddat al-abrār, by Rashīd al-Dīn Maybudī, ix-xvii. Translated by William C. Chittick. Louisville: Fons Vitae.

Danto, Arthur C. 1985. Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.

Draz, Muhammad Abdullah. 2000. Introduction to the Qurʾān. London: I. B. Tauris.

El-Awa, Salwa M. S. 2006. Textual Relations in the Qurʾān: Relevance, Coherence, and Structure. London and New York: Routledge.

Faircoulgh, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.

Faircoulgh, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.

Faircoulgh, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. London: Longman.

Givon, Thomas. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.

Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jeffery, Arthur, ed. 1958. Islam: Muhammad and His Religion. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

Keeler, Annabel. 2011. Introduction to the Translation to Tafsīr al-Tustarī by Sahl ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Tustarī, xv-lix.Translated by Annabel Keeler and Ali Keeler. Louisville: Fons Vitae.

Kurzban, Robert, John Tooby, and Leda Cosmides. 2001. “Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (26) 2001: 15387-15392. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251541498.

Lovaglia, Michael J., Jeffrey A. Houser, and Chana Barron. 2002. “Social Development and Human Evolution: Managing the Ingroup Boundary.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Chicago.

Makārim Shirāzī, Nāṣir. 2008. Tafsīr Namūnah. 27 vols. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. Also available at: https://makarem.ir/main.aspx?reader=1&lid=0&mid=22999&catid=6509&pid=61884. Accessed June 18, 2016.

Polkinghorne, Donald. 1988. Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.

Quṭb, Sayyid. 1967. Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth.

al-Rāfiʿī, Muṣṭafá Ṣādiq. 1995. Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān wa-l-balāghah al-nabawiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī.

Rauf, Abdul. 2009. “Life and Works of Mawlana Amin Ahsan Islahi (1904-1997).” Pakistan Journal of History and Culture 30 (1): 183-219.

Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.

Robinson, Neal. 1986. “The Qurʾān as the Word of God.” In Heaven and Earth; Essex Essays in Theology and Ethics, edited by A. Linzey and P. Wexler, 38-54. Worthington: Churchman.

Robinson, Neal. 1996. Discovering the Qurʾān. London: SCM Press Ltd.

Sands, Kristin Zahra. 2017. Introduction to the Translation to Laṭāʾif al-ishārāt: Subtle Allusions, by Abū l-Qāsim ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Qushayrī, ix-xxvi. Translated by Kristin Zahra Sands. Louisville: Fons Vitae.

Schaller, Mark, and Steven L. Neuberg. 2008. “Intergroup Prejudices and Intergroup Conflicts.” In Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by Charles Crawford and Dennis L. Krebs, 401-414. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schaller, Mark, Jason Faulkner, Justin H. Park, Steven L. Neuberg, and Douglas T. Kenrick. 2004. “Impressions of danger influence impressions of people: An evolutionary perspective on individual and collective cognition.” Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 2: 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.2.2004.3-4.4.

Snævarr, Stefan. 2010. Metaphors, Narratives, Emotions: Their Interplay and Impact. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042027800.

Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. 1997. Tafsīr al-Mīzān. 22 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī li-l-Maṭbūʿāt.

Yūsuf ʿAlī, ʿAbd Allāh, trans. 2009. The Meaning of the Holy Qurʾān: Complete Translation with Selected Notes. Leicestershire: The Islamic Foundation.

Van der Dennen, Johan M. G. 1999. “Of Badges, Bounds, and Boundaries: Ingroup/outgroup Differentiation and Ethnocentrism Revisited.” In Ingroup/out-group Behavior in Modern Societies: An Evolutionary Perspective, edited by Kristiaan Thienpont and Robert Cliquet, 37-74. Brussels: VlaamseGemeeschap, 1999.

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 2000a. “The Reality of Racism: On Analyzing Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In Festschrift fur diewirklichkeit, edited by G. Zurstiege, 211-226. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87330-9_23.

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 2000b. “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Martin and Ruth Wodak, 85-103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.

Van Eemeren, Frans. H., Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Douglas Walton, John Woods, David Zarefsky, Ralph H. Johnson, Christian Plantin, and Charles A. Willard. 2013. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811306.

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001.

Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and M. Meyer, 63-94. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n4.

Article Details